Kyo wrote:I never said EVERYONE has the same reaction to the same situation. Just because one person decides to cut themself because their lover broke-up with them doesn't mean the next person will do the same.
I agree. You said nothing. You made no distinction between your stories and that of homosexuality as a whole. In fact you were clearly using these, as somehow, proof that all homosexuals conform to your narrow interpretation of homosexual behaviour - "I have yet to meet one gay guy or girl who didn't...And I've known countless..."
You used your own anecdotes (which no one can verify) which had a hand full of people involved, at best, who do not represent homosexuals.
I don't remember saying that homosexuality is a mental illness. I believe it's the way some people react due to some sort of psychological experience. When I say "psychological" I don't mean, brain damage, or mental illness, or chemical imbalance (who the [censored] twisted my words into that anyway?)
If you do not like the way I am treating the content (which you created) then I encourage you to type what you actually mean. As by "psychological dysfunction" you are indicating that these individuals are abnormal and have brains that are not functioning correctly. Therefore you consider these people to be ill or sick, just like anyone who has a body part that is failing in its duty and is leading to pain, stress or ill-functionality. Do you consider heterosexuality "normal"? Sexuality is a vast spectrum, no such normal is easy to conclude. Yet you seem all to eager to hint at they're being a normal and your all to keen to avoid stating what that is.
What exactly do
you mean? All homosexuals are survivors of post-traumatic stress disorder due to them being sexually assaulted as children? As you pointed out yourself, your example can not be used with vast majority of individuals, so why treat it as such?
Because if there is a biological reason for homosexuality then there should be a biological reason for serial killers, pedophiles, rapist, thieves, people who [censored] animals, heterosexuals, prostitutes and so on and so forth. But, there is no biological reason for any of those.
How is homosexuality related to any of those behaviours? Can you successfully link all these together? As these seem to be nothing but a red herring.
I am also quite stunned at some of your choices. Homosexuality is not a lifestyle that harms other people. However you choose to link it to, a minimum of, four activates that harm others greatly. Serial killers - who deprive others of their right to life. Paedophiles - who rob children of their innocence in the most revolting manner and thieves - who steal objects you hold dear and care little for alike. Your example of bestiality is also perplexing. How is having sex with an animal similar to homosexuality? Can you not see what you are comparing homosexuality to?
When a human is homosexual, do they commit any acts that equal those in harm, such as the poorly chosen examples you used?
You have much explaining to do.