Page 2 of 3

re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Dec 04, 2005 9:58pm
by sano
not necesarily, a big part of swordsmanship is being unpredictable. with experience u learn to use different moves at different times. so kenshin would most likely have made combos or movees in his travels, and the same with hiko at his waterfall, making each other sumwat unpredictable. i think.

re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Dec 05, 2005 3:32pm
by Kenshin
i like the one when he fought Saito in Koaru's dojo when he jumps off the walls to attack Saito

re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Dec 05, 2005 10:33pm
by sano
thats their 1st fite isnt it?

re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Dec 07, 2005 1:44pm
by Kenshin
there first fight was in the Samurai X so they have fought many times

re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Dec 07, 2005 2:54pm
by sano
tru, but i meant in the series.

re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Dec 07, 2005 3:57pm
by Kenshin
yeah teh move that Saito always do

Re: re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Dec 31, 2005 11:09pm
by Nanashi
[quote="Kenshin"]that is the only way he can win the match[/quote]

I dissagree. Correct me if I'm wrong (please do) but in order to beat Shishio (at least to an extent) he didn't have to revert back to the manslayer. So I think Kenshin would win without becoming the Battousai. Peace out.

re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Jan 01, 2006 12:14am
by sano
but if u noticed, kenshin basically started to turn into the manslayer, and if hes about to lose he will start to turn bak.

re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Jan 01, 2006 1:03am
by Nanashi
True, true, But in the end he didn't have to kill to win did he? Shishio's own body teperature did, I firmly believe Kenshin could win without his manslayer coming out.

re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Jan 01, 2006 4:58am
by VHJin85
i suppose that both of them are treated as equals because Hiko, Himura, both knows the Hiten Mitsurugi technics from Hiko's previous masters therefore he teaches all that he knows and himura, going around protecting innocents also proves his ability and skills on hiten mitsurugi ryuu... both should be in hiten mitsurugi ryuu... it seems only fair for me..

re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Mar 10, 2006 11:48am
by phantomdark
Hiko would destoy Kenshin

Re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Apr 13, 2006 1:49pm
by Samurai_Dude
Hiko becuse the master is alwayse learing and becomeing stronger and stronger plus he could execute all of his moves with persision and much more speed that his underling

Re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Jun 19, 2006 6:29am
by sano
its been a while since my last post but i still think kenshin would JUST have it over hiko. on disc ... 10 i think(could be 11, i dont remember :heh: ) ... of the series, when kenshin learns the ultimate attack, he beats hiko. he doesnt kill him though but only because of his sword. and when he dips into his battousai self, he does just that, only dips into it. he comes to the brink of reverting back. anywho, those are my latest thoughts.

re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Jul 27, 2006 2:08am
by Seiji Sawamura
I got for both of them. hiko. he is cool and likes to make fun of kenshin sometimes. but he is so powerful in samurai X one man came and attack him and slashed him just like that. one move and dead. kenshin killed many men by neck and everything. he stabed them in the end but never use hiten moves to kill people. hiko does sometimes/ :-"

Re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Aug 21, 2006 9:38am
by Yumi.
Hiko. He IS the master after all...

re: The better swordsmen

Posted: Aug 30, 2006 6:54pm
by Trishina
Well I can't say who's better between them they are both good as I can say.