Page 2 of 2
Re: Should Bonds be Home Run King?
Posted: Aug 12, 2007 7:01pm
by Dragon X
how?
Re: Should Bonds be Home Run King?
Posted: Aug 12, 2007 7:01pm
by Dragon X
how?
Re: Should Bonds be Home Run King?
Posted: Aug 13, 2007 2:43pm
by Gyro Zeppeli
Dragon X wrote:how?
Drug tests and they found it in his locker
Re: Should Bonds be Home Run King?
Posted: Aug 19, 2007 12:39pm
by Dragon X
oh
Re: Should Bonds be Home Run King?
Posted: Aug 20, 2007 7:56pm
by Robbie Hendrix
So if he didnt use steriods you still think he should be homerun king amphetamines, there called grennies players have been taking those since the late 1960s, so if thats the case every pitcher and hitter who took them should be punished lol.
Re: Should Bonds be Home Run King?
Posted: Aug 22, 2007 10:25am
by Mik3
Hes not king in my mind, its still Hank Aaron. Bonds took the most hallowed record in baseball history and tainted it.
Re: Should Bonds be Home Run King?
Posted: Aug 26, 2007 1:58pm
by Gyro Zeppeli
Berserk Soldier wrote:So if he didnt use steriods you still think he should be homerun king amphetamines, there called grennies players have been taking those since the late 1960s, so if thats the case every pitcher and hitter who took them should be punished lol.
I get it now. You're a dupe account aren't you?