Page 3 of 3

re: people against animal porn

Posted: Sep 28, 2005 6:37pm
by Raoul Duke
If you are freaked out because you don't understand then you are automatically stupid, lol.

re: people against animal porn

Posted: Nov 25, 2005 3:54pm
by anneplath
Well, I voted against it, however, it depends whether you're speaking of actual beastiality or hentai including animals. Especially when you bring up the topic of the internet, I am against censorship, so my take on this is. Conserning animated beastiality, while I don't watch it, I believe it shouldn't be banned for the reason of freedom of expression.
Animals CAN'T CONSENT, so people should not be able to have intercourse with them.

re: people against animal porn

Posted: Nov 25, 2005 7:16pm
by GravyTrain
I'm against Furries altogether. So I suppose that would encompass animal porn as well.

Re: re: people against animal porn

Posted: Nov 26, 2005 10:45am
by anneplath
GravyTrain wrote:I'm against Furries altogether. So I suppose that would encompass animal porn as well.
No, actually, anthromorphics(which is what I'm assuming you are talking about, furries are the artists that draw them) are not considered animals, therefore, it is not animal porn, anthro porn is called yiff and is a different topic altogether.

Re: re: people against animal porn

Posted: Nov 26, 2005 10:47am
by GravyTrain
anneplath wrote:
GravyTrain wrote:I'm against Furries altogether. So I suppose that would encompass animal porn as well.
No, actually, anthromorphics(which is what I'm assuming you are talking about, furries are the artists that draw them) are not considered animals, therefore, it is not animal porn, anthro porn is called yiff and is a different topic altogether.
That means yiff is the gateway porn to beastiality. If the character has anything more than animal ears and a tail, it needs to go.

Re: re: people against animal porn

Posted: Nov 26, 2005 10:47pm
by anneplath
GravyTrain wrote:
anneplath wrote:
GravyTrain wrote:I'm against Furries altogether. So I suppose that would encompass animal porn as well.
No, actually, anthromorphics(which is what I'm assuming you are talking about, furries are the artists that draw them) are not considered animals, therefore, it is not animal porn, anthro porn is called yiff and is a different topic altogether.
That means yiff is the gateway porn to beastiality. If the character has anything more than animal ears and a tail, it needs to go.
Okay, let clear something up, about 90% of yiff is two(or more) anthros having sexual intercourse. So it can't be considered beastiality, nor is it the 'gateway to beastiality' because to be considered anthro the character must be -bipedal -have hands and feet -visible eyebrows or eyeridges -humanesque bodies -be able to speak. So they are a blending of both human and animal traits, and almost all people who enjoy yiff would not enjoy watching someone [censored] a dog, sheep, or other animal.

re: people against animal porn

Posted: Nov 27, 2005 12:44pm
by Pink Supervisor|EL
animal porn is wrong distastefull... and how can a person get excited watching it? cmon they do you know they're crazy by being attracted to diffrent species...

Re: people against animal porn

Posted: Mar 25, 2006 8:41am
by Dawn
I have nothing against usin toy's, but...can't they leave the poor animals alone?!When I would faind out that such a sick person lives near me then I would sneak out in the night go to his/her house get insige and rip his organs out in his/her sleep... :twisted:

re: people against animal porn

Posted: Mar 25, 2006 8:30pm
by Raoul Duke
Ha! ha! I love this thread.
You guys make me sick. You can't ban animal porn. There's too many prostitutes on the streets anyway.

re: people against animal porn

Posted: Mar 25, 2006 8:40pm
by kukutaru_ookami
I'm all for each his own but it personally makes me sick so back to me motto "People can do anything they want to get off just keep it behind closed doors cause god(s) know I don't wanna see it"

re: people against animal porn

Posted: Mar 25, 2006 8:43pm
by Nathan~Chevalier
Animal porn is just sick and wrong, this is coming from a man that gonna study zoology in college

re: people against animal porn

Posted: Mar 26, 2006 6:49pm
by rotten.head.

Define "animal porn", topic starter. This loser is like.. lost.

- Do you mean sex between two animals, and like people enjoying the view?
- Or people that draw anthros having sex with each other as art?
- Or people that actually have sex with animals?

God, I'm so slow.

re: people against animal porn

Posted: Mar 28, 2006 6:27am
by Dawn
rotten.head. we mean sex with animals...

re: people against animal porn

Posted: Mar 28, 2006 7:32am
by Symos
And not furries? Real animals. Once some sicko posted a video of a woman and a dog, but it was removed thankfully.

Re: re: people against animal porn

Posted: Apr 02, 2006 3:34pm
by rotten.head.
Dawn wrote:rotten.head. we mean sex with animals...

Ah, I see. Thanks.

I'm not going to say I'm against it or whatever, but I don't like it. People having sex with animals has been in many cases, and since I'm used to hearing the world becoming more demented by the day, it's only expected that this was going to happen. Hey, if having sex with another species doesn't involve me, then I'm okay.