Page 1 of 4

time replecation?

Posted: Jul 17, 2005 9:10pm
by Chaos Flame

re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 17, 2005 11:08pm
by BakaYasha7583
honey, i have no idea what your trying to prove. state your hypothesis before dictating and diagraming what's going on. are you trying to say that whatever happens in the past effects the future or what happens in the future effects the past? here's one to solve:

if Kagome was in the past and then went back home for dinner and Naraku destroyed the well on the fedual side...what happens to the history? being that there now is no well...did she ever fall down it to begin with? how?

re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 5:47am
by Biki
wth is this? the only thing you've accomplished is to make me laugh. if yoiu don't know at what then there's no hope for you.

re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 9:34am
by Chaos Flame
im trying to state, that it is possible for kagome or one of the other characters from InuYasha to duplicate items by leaving an item in the feudal era(preferable non-food object and non-perishable). then going to the modern era, and finding it in the same spot, then going back in time and finding the original item still there, plus the one from the modern times, then once they leave both of THOSE items in the feudal era and go to modren times, then there will be a duplicate item of the one they brought to the feudal era from modern times, if you people understand what im saying (im not good at explaining things that well...) you'll see how this is confusing, since this ignores the rule that mass cannot be created or destroyed...

re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 9:38am
by Biki
nope i don't understand it. but maybe that's for the better. anyway, i could have sworn it was energy that couldn't be created or destroyed merely transferred or changed.

Re: re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 9:40am
by Chaos Flame
Lil' Biki wrote:nope i don't understand it. but maybe that's for the better. anyway, i could have sworn it was energy that couldn't be created or destroyed merely transferred or changed.
scientific rule of consevation of mass, neither energy OR mass can be created or destroyed, you might be able to find the rule of consevation of mass and the rule of conservation of energy somewhere on the internet

re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 12:27pm
by Biki
or i could simply ask a science teacher.

re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 12:32pm
by Chaos Flame
NEVER! YOU CAN NEVER TRUST TEACHERS! THEY'RE ONLY THERE TO SCREW YOUR LIFE UP AND MAKE YOU STUPID!

re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 12:38pm
by Biki
lol. are you ok? something tells me you've had a bad run-in with a few teachers. and you're not stupid. anger management challenged maybe but not stupid. (not that you said you were)

re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 1:06pm
by BakaYasha7583
that's funny. i was actually gonna use the general idea behind this in one of my stories...more so that in the past Kag has to bury a root for a tree that holds some type of healing herb then go into her time to pick it after 500 years of growing. i get what your saying. it would be a good way for her to invest in money....maybe. see, the only problem i have is newtons (i think) one theory (not sure what it is) but basically it states:

matter cannot exist duplicatly on the same plane of reality.

more to the point, if kag has a baseball and brings it back to the past. she burries it. she then goes back to the present and picks it up, seh will not be able to return to the past with it because it already exisits in the past. matter cannot take two forms. for a real great indepth look at how this effects us and the story of inuyasha, read Sueric's Chronicles. (best story EVER)

Re: re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 4:47pm
by Chaos Flame
BakaYasha7583 wrote:that's funny. i was actually gonna use the general idea behind this in one of my stories...more so that in the past Kag has to bury a root for a tree that holds some type of healing herb then go into her time to pick it after 500 years of growing. i get what your saying. it would be a good way for her to invest in money....maybe. see, the only problem i have is newtons (i think) one theory (not sure what it is) but basically it states:

matter cannot exist duplicatly on the same plane of reality.

more to the point, if kag has a baseball and brings it back to the past. she burries it. she then goes back to the present and picks it up, seh will not be able to return to the past with it because it already exisits in the past. matter cannot take two forms. for a real great indepth look at how this effects us and the story of inuyasha, read Sueric's Chronicles. (best story EVER)
who died and made you jesus? you cant prove anything! only the letter "w" can! :x thus proving i am not independaltyly unfortunatly hipatheticaly unwitted by the monarcy of inpervious ingenuity! causing a hydro-thermical meltdown of the enlarged inisqeuizium, therefore i deem unrealistic toladgricals unstable, in which case, you are wrong, and i am right...

Re: re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 5:50pm
by Guest
who died and made you jesus? you cant prove anything! only the letter "w" can! :x thus proving i am not independaltyly unfortunatly hipatheticaly unwitted by the monarcy of inpervious ingenuity! causing a hydro-thermical meltdown of the enlarged inisqeuizium, therefore i deem unrealistic toladgricals unstable, in which case, you are wrong, and i am right...[/quote]\

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~**~*~*~*~*~*~**~*~*~*~*

what does jesus have to do with Isaac newton? :-s an also when you use more then three words in a sentence ending with 'ly' its considered bad grammar honey. :-) :-$

sooo....you are notseparatelyy (Independently ) regrettably (unfortunately ), theoretically(hypothetically), dumb (unwitted~not a word BTW ;-)) by the kingdom of unbending (impervious) cleverness(Ingenuity )? Dude.... :shock: :wink:

the constant 'W' depends as to what formula it is being divided against and whether it is inrelationn to the theory ofrelativityy or one of the laws of motion or for that matter Negating Galileo's conceptions of the universe. it depends what exactly you are trying to prove. throwing constants around will do nothing.





I'm so lost. ....uhh...give me a break, give me a break, break me off a peice of that kit kat bar....

\:D/ \:D/ \:D/

re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 6:00pm
by Chaos Flame
i dont need a translator you jerk! i meant what i said and said what i meant

re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 6:06pm
by Guest
honey, take a deep breath and calm down. you are way to overworked on this. 8)

Re: re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 6:09pm
by Chaos Flame
Anonymous wrote:honey, take a deep breath and calm down. you are way to overworked on this. 8)
NO YOU'RE NOT! I AM! YOUR NOBODY!

re: time replecation?

Posted: Jul 18, 2005 6:22pm
by BakaYasha7583
Chaos! REALX!