Absolute Anime

yeah well... do love my avi...

and doke whatever the [censored] your name is, now i understand what your talking about. if you would have presented that in the first place, i wouldnt have said that. and realy dont try to be the argument master because G-trian and aristotle will beat you in that contest.

Homunculus Lust wrote:yeah well... do love my avi...

and doke whatever the [censored] your name is, now i understand what your talking about. if you would have presented that in the first place, i wouldnt have said that. and realy dont try to be the argument master because G-trian and aristotle will beat you in that contest.

First of all sis, who said anything about trying to an arguement master? All I did was present my view on the matter in the best way I saw fit, and last time I checked that was the point of a forum.

Second of all I said exactly what I said last time I posted, the only difference is I added two links to back up what I said, notice how most of my second post is in quote boxes, don't believe me go and check it out yourself. Next time be sure to read the whole thing before you make a comment about what I said.


Oh and the name is kokemule you would do well to remember it as you will be screaming it later

KoleMuleJr, you've maid some excellent points. I couldn't agree with you more. You are correct, there are indeed more serious acts of discrimination across the world, in Darfur and many other places.

History and human nature is chronologically and culturally biased. Back in the 19th and 20th century, blacks were discrimnated. Today they aren't; at least not here in the US.

Today, hate is directed at homosexuals. Again, history and human nature are CHRONOLOGICALLY and CULTURALLY BIASED. Times change. People change. Emotions change. And as we identify a so called infinite amount of faults in our society, we need to find someone else to blame it on. Heaven forbid we attempt to realize that maybe it was our own fault. It happened in Germany with the Holocaust. It happened with Japanese Americans during WWII. It happened back when our American history began, with the removal of indians and the everlasting expansion westward, basically shoving Mexico out of Texas and California.

Today, we want to blame the homosexuals. And in other nations, they want to blame other people. If we want everyone to be equal, regardless of race, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ha, human nature for chrissake, we need to treat each situation equally and fairly. Equality, equality, equality. Got the picture?

And hey, it's not our fault the media only covers certain hate crime issues. Wake up and smell the dark and bitter coffee of our nation. Our society is not at all perfect, we still have alot of issues, and hatred for homosexuality is one of them.

Lawliet wrote:KoleMuleJr, you've maid some excellent points.

No he hasn't.
The stupid comparisons he made don't support his assertions.

Aristotle wrote:

Lawliet wrote:KoleMuleJr, you've maid some excellent points.

No he hasn't.
The stupid comparisons he made don't support his assertions.

Yeah I am really sure your right. None of my comparisons proved that other people had it worse than the gays and lesbians do now. And using stuff from the past and present to prove it, what the [censored] was I thinking. I should be more like you right?

NeoKokeMule wrote:

Aristotle wrote:

Lawliet wrote:KoleMuleJr, you've maid some excellent points.

No he hasn't.
The stupid comparisons he made don't support his assertions.

Yeah I am really sure your right. None of my comparisons proved that other people had it worse than the gays and lesbians do now. And using stuff from the past and present to prove it, what the [censored] was I thinking. I should be more like you right?

Actually Aristotle (I hate to call you that, lol) he indeed has made excellent points.

It's funny...Treat all situations and opinions equally and then we can begin to call ourselves people of equality.

Lawliet wrote:

NeoKokeMule wrote:

Aristotle wrote:

Lawliet wrote:KoleMuleJr, you've maid some excellent points.

No he hasn't.
The stupid comparisons he made don't support his assertions.

Yeah I am really sure your right. None of my comparisons proved that other people had it worse than the gays and lesbians do now. And using stuff from the past and present to prove it, what the [censored] was I thinking. I should be more like you right?

Actually Aristotle (I hate to call you that, lol) he indeed has made excellent points.

It's funny...Treat all situations and opinions equally and then we can begin to call ourselves people of equality.

First of all, the fact he "beat" you doesn't mean his points are "excellent", you are obviously unintelligent.

Secondly, treating all opinions as equal is the dumbest thing you can do, you're an idiot.

Should we treat my opinion that you have a penis on your head, equal to your opinion that you don't? Of bloody course not!

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not to their own facts.

...You clearly have a penis on your head, therefore your opinion that you dow't is inferior to mine. (you see my point)

And the thing about treating situations equally is so [censored] stupid I'll just ignore it.

NeoKokeMule wrote:The reason why g/l are being discriminated is that they are different . It has long been the history of mankind to hate what is not the norm and being gay or lesbian just falls under that category.

You're saying that because they chose to be part of a minority group they should expect to be discriminated against?
1. Its not necessarily a choice
2. The fact that minority groups have been historically discriminated against does not justift it, or make it in any way less significant. Historically woman were always made to stay home and do housework, they were not allowed to go outside, get an education, or get a paying job, and their husband was allowed to beat her.
If a husband beats his wife should we tell her to shutup and clean the dishes because historically woman were discriminated against for hundreds of years? Gee I wonder.

NeoKokeMule wrote:In addition, they make it worse for themselves by this " O woe is me" attitude that they have.
[/i]

^ Really silly generalisation. And are you intimating that they have no right to protest because other groups have experienced discrimination?
I think previous discrimination might be reason to protest. Protest led to the eventual freedom of african-american slaves, for example.

NeoKokeMule wrote:There are genocides going on around the world that we choose to ignore, but anytime someone famous or otherwise in the United States merely utters something like "queer" there is this huge media uproar, and all these gay and lesbian groups stir up this huge protest and all useless [censored] that people do not want to hear about.

That is the exaggerative American media's fault. They're not interested in the Congo or Rwanda. Don't blame that on homosexuals, homoephobe.

NeoKokeMule wrote:However, where was the huge protest every time a black man was lynched back in the 18 and 19 hundreds? Where was the protest when thousands of Native Americans were massacred and forced to move from their homelands in the early days of U.S. history?
And where are the protest today about the hundreds of thousand of people in Sudan, where a genocide is going on right now, while still more are losing their homes, their children, their way of life, all because of a few ethnic differences? Where is their media coverage?
[/i]

Maybe if they protested there would be a change? You're right lawliet, excellent point.

PS: see my last rebuttel, thats the media choosing what to show.

NeoKokeMule wrote:If you ask me g/l have it easy compared to the other groups of people who have been discriminated against because they're different and they really better get their priorities straight when they take up this whole "woe is me" attitude, because there are many groups of people who have been discriminated against who would love to trade places with the gays and lesbians. So, watch what you say when you say that they are being, discriminated against, hated and abused.
[/i]

lol, you're an idiot. This conclusion only reiterates all of the idiotic, "excellent" points you made throughout this post.
They are being discriminated, hated and abused, obviously not on as wide scale as other minority groups previously in history, but that is entirely irrelevant. You are dumb.

If someone is murdered, and someone else is stabbed, I'm sure the murdered person would rather he was only stabbed. But because that person got murdered, if he not allowed to prosecute his attacker?

Your comparisons don't justify your conclusions. I am right. Don't bother arguing, nobody cares.

I care.

dont listen to gravytrain, he is a homophobe

Mistress of Yaoi wrote:dont listen to gravytrain, he is a homophobe

And you use gay sex between men to get your sick little kicks. You big fat homophile.

G-Train wrote:

Mistress of Yaoi wrote:dont listen to gravytrain, he is a homophobe

And you use gay sex between men to get your sick little kicks. You big fat homophile.

Your point being? We all have our own preferances.

Mistress of Yaoi wrote:

G-Train wrote:

Mistress of Yaoi wrote:dont listen to gravytrain, he is a homophobe

And you use gay sex between men to get your sick little kicks. You big fat homophile.

Your point being? We all have our own preferances.

Exactly. So what's wrong with being a "homophobe"?
Ha, you totally contradicted yourself.

Homophobia was not the kind of 'preferance' as you put it, i was talking about.

Aristotle wrote:

Lawliet wrote:

NeoKokeMule wrote:

Aristotle wrote: No he hasn't.
The stupid comparisons he made don't support his assertions.

Yeah I am really sure your right. None of my comparisons proved that other people had it worse than the gays and lesbians do now. And using stuff from the past and present to prove it, what the [censored] was I thinking. I should be more like you right?

Actually Aristotle (I hate to call you that, lol) he indeed has made excellent points.

It's funny...Treat all situations and opinions equally and then we can begin to call ourselves people of equality.

First of all, the fact he "beat" you doesn't mean his points are "excellent", you are obviously unintelligent.

Secondly, treating all opinions as equal is the dumbest thing you can do, you're an idiot.

Should we treat my opinion that you have a penis on your head, equal to your opinion that you don't? Of bloody course not!

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not to their own facts.

...You clearly have a penis on your head, therefore your opinion that you dow't is inferior to mine. (you see my point)

And the thing about treating situations equally is so [censored] stupid I'll just ignore it.

NeoKokeMule wrote:The reason why g/l are being discriminated is that they are different . It has long been the history of mankind to hate what is not the norm and being gay or lesbian just falls under that category.

You're saying that because they chose to be part of a minority group they should expect to be discriminated against?
1. Its not necessarily a choice
2. The fact that minority groups have been historically discriminated against does not justift it, or make it in any way less significant. Historically woman were always made to stay home and do housework, they were not allowed to go outside, get an education, or get a paying job, and their husband was allowed to beat her.
If a husband beats his wife should we tell her to shutup and clean the dishes because historically woman were discriminated against for hundreds of years? Gee I wonder.

NeoKokeMule wrote:In addition, they make it worse for themselves by this " O woe is me" attitude that they have.
[/i]

^ Really silly generalisation. And are you intimating that they have no right to protest because other groups have experienced discrimination?
I think previous discrimination might be reason to protest. Protest led to the eventual freedom of african-american slaves, for example.

NeoKokeMule wrote:There are genocides going on around the world that we choose to ignore, but anytime someone famous or otherwise in the United States merely utters something like "queer" there is this huge media uproar, and all these gay and lesbian groups stir up this huge protest and all useless [censored] that people do not want to hear about.

That is the exaggerative American media's fault. They're not interested in the Congo or Rwanda. Don't blame that on homosexuals, homoephobe.

NeoKokeMule wrote:However, where was the huge protest every time a black man was lynched back in the 18 and 19 hundreds? Where was the protest when thousands of Native Americans were massacred and forced to move from their homelands in the early days of U.S. history?
And where are the protest today about the hundreds of thousand of people in Sudan, where a genocide is going on right now, while still more are losing their homes, their children, their way of life, all because of a few ethnic differences? Where is their media coverage?
[/i]

Maybe if they protested there would be a change? You're right lawliet, excellent point.

PS: see my last rebuttel, thats the media choosing what to show.

NeoKokeMule wrote:If you ask me g/l have it easy compared to the other groups of people who have been discriminated against because they're different and they really better get their priorities straight when they take up this whole "woe is me" attitude, because there are many groups of people who have been discriminated against who would love to trade places with the gays and lesbians. So, watch what you say when you say that they are being, discriminated against, hated and abused.
[/i]

lol, you're an idiot. This conclusion only reiterates all of the idiotic, "excellent" points you made throughout this post.
They are being discriminated, hated and abused, obviously not on as wide scale as other minority groups previously in history, but that is entirely irrelevant. You are dumb.

If someone is murdered, and someone else is stabbed, I'm sure the murdered person would rather he was only stabbed. But because that person got murdered, if he not allowed to prosecute his attacker?

Your comparisons don't justify your conclusions. I am right. Don't bother arguing, nobody cares.

Look, whatever. All I'm saying is that it's ridiculous to bash and discriminate homosexual relationships, nothing more, and your failure to see my point is indicative of how intelligent you truly are, sir Aristotle.

exelent pionts aristotle. your like an elder except you not old and ugly your young and shmexy